Prudential Regulation Authority Rulebook

We are required by the FSMA to establish a scheme for compensating consumers when authorised firms are unable, or are unlikely to be able, to satisfy claims against them. The body established to operate and administer the compensation scheme is the Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd (FSCS). The relevant FSA rules are in the Compensation sourcebook (COMP). For further information about the FSCS, please see its website at: www.fscs.org.uk.

The FSCS includes all firms conducting mortgage mediation and insurance mediation.

If an authorised mortgage or insurance intermediary fails and it is unable to meet its obligations to its customers, then eligible claimants can seek compensation from the FSCS for their losses. The protection provided would broadly cover two types of situation where a firm has failed. The first covers the risk that the intermediary is holding a premium that it has not passed to the insurer or money from a paid claim is being held. The second situation covers mis-selling or bad advice given by the intermediary.

For a claimant to receive compensation from the FSCS in relation to insurance or mortgage mediation carried on by an authorised firm, three criteria must be satisfied:

The compensation limit for insurance mediation where the intermediary fails is 100% of the first £2,000 and 90% of the remainder and 100% for claims in respect of a liability subject to compulsory insurance (COMP 10.2.3 R). (There are further details about what is compulsory insurance in the Handbook Glossary under the definition 'liability subject to compulsory insurance'.)

The compensation limit for mortgage mediation is 100% of the first £30,000 and 90% of the next £20,000, making the maximum compensation £48,000 (COMP 10.2.3 R).

The FSCS is funded by levies on authorised firms. So, in addition to their FSA fees (see Part I, Chapter 19) authorised mortgage and insurance intermediaries will need to contribute towards the FSCS's operating costs and, if necessary, its compensation costs.

The FOS has been set up to resolve disputes between consumers and firms. Its decision making is independent of the FSA. The FOS provides a mechanism for resolving disputes, which is a simple, informal and accessible alternative to the courts. FOS's compulsory jurisdiction covers complaints against authorised firms concerning their regulated activities and certain other specified financial services activities. It is provided free of charge to complainants. FOS's decisions are based on what is 'fair and reasonable' and are binding on firms if a complainant accepts them. The rules relating to the FOS are in DISP. For further information on the FOS, please see its website at www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk.

The compulsory jurisdiction of the FOS includes firms carrying out insurance mediation and mortgage mediation.

The FOS is funded in part by a general levy (payable by all firms covered by the scheme) and in part by case fees (i.e. a fee paid by firms for each chargeable complaint against them handled by the FOS).
The following chapters of this Guide are also relevant:

Complaints - Part I, Chapter 14