BSOCS 4

Funding

BSOCS 4.1

Funding risks

BSOCS 4.1.1

See Notes

handbook-guidance
Societies' core business, financing long-term residential mortgages with short-term personal savings, necessarily involves a high degree of maturity transformation, and this constitutes a major financial risk that all societies need to manage.

BSOCS 4.1.2

See Notes

handbook-guidance
Wholesale markets may provide funding at a more definitive maturity than deposit funding, but may concentrate the refinancing risks societies face. Exposure to re-financing risk needs careful management, and an awareness of the risk of over-reliance on an assumption of continued access to the wholesale market.

BSOCS 4.1.3

See Notes

handbook-guidance
The particular constitution of societies means that the scale of deposit funding has a significant impact on the position of investor members. The public perceives society share accounts to be as secure as (or even more secure than) bank deposits although they hold a subordinated creditor rank. A society which gears itself up significantly with wholesale funds thereby dilutes the security of its members, whilst at the same time increasing its refinancing and liquidity risks.

BSOCS 4.1.4

See Notes

handbook-guidance
To access the wholesale markets some societies have been credit-rated by external agencies. Obtaining such a rating exposes the society to the danger of a change in market view of the sector or the society, and the process of obtaining and continuing management of the rating needs careful consideration and monitoring. The FSA would not expect societies on the Administered or Matched approaches to have external ratings, and would expect societies on the extended approach, if they have external ratings at all, to confine them to covered bond issues only.

BSOCS 4.2

Wholesale maturity structure for a society which is a simplified ILAS BIPRU firm

BSOCS 4.2.1

See Notes

handbook-guidance
For simplified ILAS BIPRU firms BIPRU 12.6.10 R sets out how they should calculate the wholesale net cash outflow component of their simplified buffer requirement.

BSOCS 4.2.2

See Notes

handbook-guidance
Whilst a society which is a simplified ILAS BIPRU firm may choose to fund lending activities with wholesale funding of duration greater than three months, such funding will still influence the peak cumulative wholesale cash outflow position (and thus the simplified buffer requirement) when it is within three months from maturity. Societies using wholesale funding should therefore manage their wholesale maturity profile so that it does not cause excessive volatility to their liquid assets buffer.

BSOCS 4.2.3

See Notes

handbook-guidance
To achieve this, a society which is a simplified ILAS BIPRU firm should ensure that its maturity profile of wholesale funding, net of any maturing treasury assets held to redeem the funding, resembles the respective profiles in BSOCS 4.5.1G.

BSOCS 4.3

Funding limits

BSOCS 4.3.1

See Notes

handbook-guidance
(1) Whilst the section 7 funding limit is expressed as a minimum of 50% share account funding, societies should, for prudential monitoring purposes, draw up a funding policy which incorporates an internal policy limit based on a maximum level of funds raised by means other than the issue of shares (i.e. an inversion of the "nature limit"). In order to avoid any possibility of an inadvertent breach of the 1986 Act, these internal policy limits should be set at levels below the 50% statutory maximum.
(2) Similarly, one of the conditions in BIPRU 12.6 to be satisfied by a firm for it to be eligible for a simplified ILAS waiver is that a minimum percentage of the firm's total liabilities are accounted for by retail deposits. The funding policy drawn up by a simplified ILAS BIPRU firm should include an internal policy limit referring to a maximum percentage of the firm's total liabilities accounted for by liabilities other than retail deposits (i.e. an inversion of the condition in BIPRU 12.6). This maximum percentage should be set at a level below that necessary to satisfy the conditions in BIPRU 12.6.

BSOCS 4.3.2

See Notes

handbook-guidance
(1) In setting funding limits, the board should consider all funding requirements over the period of their society's current corporate plan, and avoid setting limits at levels where usage is either unplanned or highly unlikely.
(2) Wholesale funding can be divided into three broad types originating from different sources: offshore/overseas retail deposits up-streamed to the society, deposits from non-financial / non-individuals and wholesale funding from the financial markets.
(3) Boards should set policy sub-limits for each of these sources as well as an overall limit (e.g. a society might set an overall deposit liabilities limit of 30%, with sub-limits of 25% for wholesale deposit funding and 10% for offshore/overseas funding, the total of the sub-limits exceeding the overall limit only on the basis that both could not be used to their full extent simultaneously or to the extent that some of the funding is both wholesale and offshore/overseas).

BSOCS 4.4

Repurchase (repo) transactions (including reverse repo)

BSOCS 4.4.1

See Notes

handbook-guidance
The FSA would expect that societies adopting the extended, comprehensive or trading approaches to treasury management are likely to have the systems and capabilities to transact repo business. The FSA would expect that their boards would obtain full legal advice before agreeing counterparty documentation.

BSOCS 4.4.2

See Notes

handbook-guidance
Whilst societies on the matched treasury risk management approach may have appropriate treasury risk management controls and procedures to undertake repo transactions, they should discuss any such plans with their supervisor before undertaking those transactions.

BSOCS 4.5

Funding risk management table

BSOCS 4.5.1

See Notes

handbook-guidance
This table sets out guidance for wholesale funding in accordance with the five approaches (see BSOCS 1.1.2G). It shows the criteria which societies should use in developing the review of financial risk management, as detailed in BSOCS 1.15. It is designed to draw management and supervisory attention to areas of a society's business model which are different from the FSA's general expectation for societies on their respective treasury management approach. Societies should expect their supervisors to focus in greater detail on those areas of difference, to identify whether business risks and controls are aligned and if not to develop plans to address the mis-alignment. As such, these expectations should not be interpreted as hard limits but as input into establishing appropriate policies and the basis for supervisory dialogue.

WHOLESALE FUNDING FROM FINANCIAL MARKETS